Welcome to the Umbraco Community!

The Umbraco Community is at the heart of the Umbraco ecosystem. It’s built on people coming together to share ideas, help each other, and make Umbraco better every day.

Come see how the Community stays connected, what makes it such a great place to be, and how you can join in and get involved. We always have room for more people to join!

MVP Summit audience.jpg 54610954933_1fd227623f_o (1).jpg Panel speaking in mics at umbraco event Person looking at laptop 52993341606_3b3a6a6991_o.jpg 2025 Group picture 1740139582170.jpg IMG_4217.jpg IMG20251030182101.jpg 2025 Community Teams day at Umbraco HQ DSC04687.jpg DSC05663.jpg MVP getting high five on stage MVPs speaking at MVP Summit 2 MVP waving at MVP Summit MVPs showing off awards IMG20251106141733.jpg 20251204_173423.jpg b6f67a24-17ea-4a21-bc55-65eca97d86ac.jpeg Codegarden 2023 Business Summit - people talking.jpg People high five'ing at Codegarden.jpg Boat ride 2025 Codegarden runners running

Get involved in the community

There's so many ways to get involved in the Umbraco community. 

A person looking into his laptop surrounded by people and light

New here? Welcome! We have a complete newcomer's guide to Umbraco and the Umbraco Community waiting for you.

A woman concentrating and looking down

No matter your interests, skills and time availability, there’s a way for you to participate in the Umbraco community. 

Two people high five'ing

Umbraco Meetups are a great way to engage with the Umbraco community and meet other like-minded people.

See what's happening

Join a meetup or an event near you - see all upcoming Umbraco events here

Blog posts from the Umbraco Community

Explore the latest blog posts from our community. Want to add your future blog posts to the list? Contact us here and let us know!

Introducing ImageSharp TrimCache for Umbraco

A free Umbraco package that trims the ImageSharp.Web image cache by age on a schedule, for both the local physical cache and Azure Blob storage. Stop the media cache growing unbounded on Umbraco Cloud and self hosted sites.

by Nevitech Blog

Letting AI agents loose on Examine

I've been maintaining Examine for a very long time now. It's the search and indexing library that sits underneath every Umbraco site, and like any project that's been around long enough, it has plenty of hot paths that could be faster, a steady trickle of issues that need triaging, and a backlog of "I'll get to that eventually" performance work that, well… I never actually get to. So a couple of months ago I thought I'd try an experiment - what if I stopped doing all of that myself and instead let a bunch of AI agents do it for me, on a schedule, while I got on with everything else? This post is about how that went. I've shipped a few releases off the back of it and some of the hot-path improvements are genuinely a bit ridiculous. So what are these "agentic workflows"? The thing I installed is GitHub Next's Agentic Workflows - a set of markdown-defined workflows that run in GitHub Actions and drive an AI agent to do actual maintenance work on your repo. They're not chat bots. They run on a schedule, they have persistent memory, they open real pull requests, and they leave the "should this ship?" decision to me. I ended up with a few of them running on Examine: Perf Improver - runs daily, hunts for performance bottlenecks, writes benchmarks to actually prove the improvement, and opens a draft PR with the before/after numbers. Efficiency Improver - its scrappier sibling, focused on the smaller allocation-and-LINQ-state-machine wins that add up over time. Daily Issue Triage - goes through untriaged issues, sets types, applies labels, spots duplicates, and leaves a tidy triage report for me. Agentic Maintenance - keeps the whole setup ticking along. Each one is just a markdown file in .github/workflows/ with a description, a schedule, some safe-outputs limits (things like "you may open at most 4 PRs per run, and they must be drafts") and a big prompt describing how to behave. That's it. The nice part is that the guardrails are declarative, so the agent can't merge its own PRs, it can't touch protected files, and it can only comment so many times per run. All of that is baked in. How it actually works day to day The bit that makes this more than a gimmick is the persistent memory. Every run, the Perf Improver reads its own notes - which build/test/benchmark commands it validated, what's on its optimisation backlog, what it worked on last time, and which suggestions I've already ticked off. Then it does a couple of tasks in a round-robin fashion so it's not endlessly poking at the same corner of the codebase. It also keeps a single rolling "Monthly Activity" issue open with a checklist of what needs my attention. So my side of it is pretty simple: the agent opens a draft PR with measured before/after numbers, I read it and run CI, and if I'm happy with it I merge. That's the whole loop. I'm the reviewer, the agent is the workhorse doing the grind I never had time for. So what did they actually get done? Over roughly the last two months, here's what these workflows actually got up to on Examine: 124 successful Perf Improver runs and 9 successful Efficiency Improver runs 20 successful Daily Issue Triage runs quietly keeping the issue tracker tidy 24 performance/efficiency PRs reviewed and merged (13 from Perf Improver, 11 from Efficiency Improver) between late May and the end of June And the bit that actually matters - three releases shipped off this work: v3.8.0, v3.9.0 and the v4.0.0-beta.7 pre-release That last point is really the whole thing. This isn't a pile of speculative branches rotting in a fork somewhere - it's code that went through my review, passed CI, and is now sitting in NuGet packages that real Umbraco sites are running. Show me the numbers Right, this is the part I actually get excited about. One of my favourite things about the Perf Improver is that its prompt tells it to only attempt improvements it can actually measure - establish a baseline first, make the change, then measure again and document both numbers. For the algorithmic hot-path stuff that means benchmarks, so along the way it built out a proper BenchmarkDotNet suite that compares the current source against the published NuGet packages (3.0.1 through 3.3.0), which means I can show you real, reproducible deltas instead of hand waving. The full-text search hot path ManagedQuery is the primary full-text search entry point in Examine - it's what runs on basically every search. The agent noticed it had no dedicated benchmark, wrote one, and then stacked up a series of small, individually measured changes: a volatile factory cache in SearchContext.GetFieldValueType, an early return in the extract-terms check, and killing off some redundant ConcurrentDictionary lookups in AddDocument. Here's the current source vs the most recent 3.3.0 release, on a 1,000-document index: Method Version Mean Allocated ManagedQueryAllFields 3.3.0 11.42 ms 1,323 KB ManagedQueryAllFields Source 2.17 ms 371 KB That's about 5.3x faster and roughly 3.6x less memory allocated on the single most travelled code path in the whole library. On the busiest thing Examine does. I'll happily take that. Building queries GroupedAnd / GroupedOr / GroupedNot are the workhorses of the query builder. A little string[] fast-path (skipping a defensive .ToArray() copy when the caller already handed it a string[]) plus some allocation trimming got this: Method Version Mean Allocated CreateQueryOnly 3.3.0 3,995 ns 8.34 KB CreateQueryOnly Source 319 ns 2.20 KB GroupedAndStringArray 3.3.0 21,377 ns 21.10 KB GroupedAndStringArray Source 16,659 ns 14.34 KB The CreateQuery() baseline dropping from 8.34 KB down to 2.2 KB is a lovely little win, and the grouped clauses are about 25% faster with a third of the allocation shaved off. Constructing a ValueSet Every single document you index goes through a ValueSet constructor. The old path allocated an intermediate dictionary and a generator state machine per field, which is exactly the kind of thing you don't notice until you're bulk indexing a big site. The agent got rid of both: Method Version Mean Allocated FromDictionary5Fields 3.3.0 1,183 ns 2,200 B FromDictionary5Fields Source 226 ns 592 B FromDictionary20Fields 3.3.0 4,007 ns 6,544 B FromDictionary20Fields Source 654 ns 1,520 B That's roughly 5-6x faster and about 4x less allocated on indexing, and when you're rebuilding the index on a large Umbraco site that adds up fast. The really nice touch is that these benchmark result tables now live in <remarks> doc-comments right next to the benchmark code, so the numbers are versioned in the repo alongside the thing they measure. The agent did that bit too. Was it actually worth it? For me the thing that makes it work is the measurement. Everything comes to me as a small, focused, draft PR with the numbers attached, so I can look at it, sanity check it, run CI, and decide in a couple of minutes. It's not zero effort - I still read every change before it goes anywhere near main - but the ratio is fantastic. I'm getting a steady stream of well-measured, single-purpose performance PRs on a library I care about, on paths I'd genuinely never have found the time to optimise by hand, and I've shipped real releases because of it. For a project I maintain around everything else, that's a pretty great deal. If you maintain a repo with a backlog you never get to, especially performance work that needs benchmarks to justify it, I'd recommend giving GitHub Next's agentics a go. You can see all of it out in the open on the Examine repo - the [perf-improver] and [efficiency-improver] PRs, the benchmark suite, and the releases they fed into. And there's a nice bonus here for me too: ExamineX, my managed, cloud-hosted Examine search offering, runs on this exact same internal plumbing. So all this work the agents have been doing to tighten up Examine's query and indexing hot paths feeds straight through into ExamineX - the underlying engine gets faster and leaner, and every ExamineX site gets those wins for free without changing a thing. If you'd rather have your search running as a managed service instead of hosting Lucene indexes on your own servers, that's what ExamineX is there for. 🙂

by Shanon Thompson (Deminick)

Using Umbraco.Automate to populate content from an API

Learn how to automatically populate Umbraco content from an external API using Umbraco.Automate, with a hands-on PokéAPI example and video demo.

by Owain Williams

Get in contact with us